Compare commits

..
Author SHA1 Message Date
ChuckBuildsandClaude Opus 5 f31b458bfd feat(store): evaluate compatible_versions, not just the floor
Closes the gap CodeRabbit surfaced on #427. `compatible_versions` is the
canonical compatibility contract -- schema/manifest_schema.json marks it
required, all 42 published manifests carry it -- and it is the only field that
can express an *upper* bound. `ledmatrix_min_version` is a floor and cannot
say "not compatible with 4.x".

The gate read only the floor, so a plugin declaring ["2.0.0 - 2.9.9"] would be
installed on 3.2.0 regardless of having said it stops at 2.x.

check() now evaluates both and the more restrictive wins. The array is a set of
alternatives (satisfying any one entry suffices), supporting every form the
schema permits: >=, <=, >, <, ~, ^, a bare exact version, and an inclusive
"A - B" range, with prerelease/build suffixes tolerated.

Refusal still requires evidence. Anything unparseable, absent, or below
TRUSTWORTHY_FLOOR resolves to compatible.

That last point needed a new strict parser. parse_semver is deliberately
lenient -- it strips non-digits and yields (0, 0, 0) for a string with no
numbers at all. Harmless for a floor (0.0.0 never blocks) but wrong for a
range, where the same leniency turned an unreadable spec into a *refusal*: a
manifest whose only entry was garbage got compared against 0.0.0 and refused.
Range specs are now shape-checked first, so garbage reads as "no evidence".
parse_semver itself is unchanged, since the loader depends on its behaviour.

Verified: 815 core unit tests pass, 18 of them new. Swept the real registry --
all 42 published manifests, at cores 1.0.0 / 2.0.0 / 3.1.0 / 3.2.0 / 4.0.0 --
and nothing is refused at any of them. The gate stays inert for shipped
plugins, which is the property that makes it safe to land ahead of B5.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Udr6MfaFLUPhX5Fgo67Jf5
2026-08-03 18:07:59 -04:00
2 changed files with 202 additions and 13 deletions
+120 -13
View File
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ fixes their version string. See `docs/SPORTS_UNIFICATION.md`, phase B4.
from __future__ import annotations
import re
from typing import Any, Dict, Optional, Tuple
# Below this, the core's self-reported version is not evidence of anything.
@@ -49,6 +50,92 @@ def parse_semver(value: Any) -> Optional[Tuple[int, int, int]]:
return tuple(nums) # type: ignore[return-value]
# `parse_semver` is deliberately lenient — it strips non-digits and yields
# (0, 0, 0) for a string with no numbers at all, which is fine for a floor
# (a floor of 0.0.0 never blocks anything) but wrong for a range, where the
# same leniency would turn an unreadable spec into a *refusal*. Range specs
# are therefore validated against this first, so garbage reads as "no
# evidence" rather than "incompatible".
_VERSION_TOKEN = re.compile(r"^v?\d+(\.\d+){0,2}(-[\w.-]+)?(\+[\w.-]+)?$")
def _parse_strict(value: str) -> Optional[Tuple[int, int, int]]:
"""`parse_semver`, but ``None`` unless the string really looks like one."""
if not isinstance(value, str) or not _VERSION_TOKEN.match(value.strip()):
return None
return parse_semver(value)
def _satisfies_range(core: Tuple[int, int, int], spec: str) -> Optional[bool]:
"""Does ``core`` satisfy one `compatible_versions` entry?
Returns ``None`` when the spec cannot be parsed — the caller treats that as
"no evidence" rather than as a refusal, so an unrecognised spelling never
costs a user a working install.
Supports the forms `schema/manifest_schema.json` permits: `>=`, `<=`, `>`,
`<`, `~`, `^`, a bare exact version, and an inclusive `A - B` range.
Prerelease/build suffixes are tolerated and ignored, matching `parse_semver`.
"""
spec = spec.strip()
if not spec:
return None
if " - " in spec: # inclusive range, e.g. "2.0.0 - 3.1.0"
low_raw, _, high_raw = spec.partition(" - ")
low, high = _parse_strict(low_raw), _parse_strict(high_raw)
if low is None or high is None:
return None
return low <= core <= high
for op in (">=", "<=", ">", "<", "~", "^"):
if spec.startswith(op):
target = _parse_strict(spec[len(op):])
if target is None:
return None
if op == ">=":
return core >= target
if op == "<=":
return core <= target
if op == ">":
return core > target
if op == "<":
return core < target
if op == "~":
# Patch-level changes only: >=X.Y.Z, <X.(Y+1).0
return target <= core < (target[0], target[1] + 1, 0)
# "^": minor and patch changes: >=X.Y.Z, <(X+1).0.0
return target <= core < (target[0] + 1, 0, 0)
exact = _parse_strict(spec)
return None if exact is None else core == exact
def satisfies_compatible_versions(
manifest: Dict[str, Any], core: Tuple[int, int, int]
) -> Optional[bool]:
"""Evaluate the manifest's `compatible_versions` array against ``core``.
The array is a set of *alternatives*: satisfying any one entry means the
plugin declares itself compatible. Returns ``None`` when the field is
absent or no entry could be parsed, so callers can distinguish "declared
incompatible" from "did not say".
This is the field `schema/manifest_schema.json` marks **required**, and it
is the only one that can express an upper bound — `ledmatrix_min_version`
is a floor and cannot say "not compatible with 4.x".
"""
specs = manifest.get('compatible_versions')
if not isinstance(specs, list) or not specs:
return None
verdicts = [_satisfies_range(core, s) for s in specs if isinstance(s, str)]
parsed = [v for v in verdicts if v is not None]
if not parsed:
return None
return any(parsed)
def declared_min_version(manifest: Dict[str, Any]) -> Optional[str]:
"""The core version this plugin says it needs, or ``None`` if it doesn't say.
@@ -74,26 +161,46 @@ def declared_min_version(manifest: Dict[str, Any]) -> Optional[str]:
def check(manifest: Dict[str, Any], core_version: str) -> Tuple[bool, Optional[str]]:
"""Return ``(compatible, reason)``.
``compatible`` is False **only** when the plugin declares a parseable floor,
the core reports a parseable and trustworthy version, and the floor is
genuinely above it. Every uncertain case resolves to compatible: an
undeclared floor, an unparseable version on either side, or a core whose
version is below `TRUSTWORTHY_FLOOR`. Refusing on a guess would break
working installs, which is the more expensive mistake here.
Two fields can say a plugin is incompatible and **the more restrictive
wins**:
- `compatible_versions` — the schema-required array of semver ranges, and
the only one that can express an upper bound.
- `ledmatrix_min_version` (or the deprecated `ledmatrix_min`) — the
per-release floor inside `versions[]`.
They agree across every published manifest today except `7-segment-clock`,
but they *can* disagree, and a plugin that says `["2.0.0 - 2.9.9"]` means
"not compatible with 3.x" no matter what its floor says.
``compatible`` is False **only** on evidence: the core reports a parseable,
trustworthy version and a field genuinely excludes it. Every uncertain case
resolves to compatible — nothing declared, an unparseable version on either
side, or a core below `TRUSTWORTHY_FLOOR`. Refusing on a guess breaks a
working install, which is the more expensive mistake here.
``reason`` is user-facing text, present only when incompatible.
"""
declared = declared_min_version(manifest)
needed = parse_semver(declared)
if needed is None:
return True, None
current = parse_semver(core_version)
if current is None or current < TRUSTWORTHY_FLOOR:
return True, None
if needed > current:
name = manifest.get('name') or manifest.get('id') or 'This plugin'
name = manifest.get('name') or manifest.get('id') or 'This plugin'
# Ranges first: they are the canonical field and can rule out a core that
# clears the floor.
if satisfies_compatible_versions(manifest, current) is False:
specs = ", ".join(
s for s in manifest.get('compatible_versions', []) if isinstance(s, str))
return False, (
f"{name} supports LEDMatrix {specs}, but this system is running "
f"{core_version}. Install a build in that range, or a plugin "
f"version that supports {core_version}."
)
declared = declared_min_version(manifest)
needed = parse_semver(declared)
if needed is not None and needed > current:
return False, (
f"{name} requires LEDMatrix {declared} or newer, but this system is "
f"running {core_version}. Update LEDMatrix first, then install it."
+82
View File
@@ -230,3 +230,85 @@ class TestLoaderAndStoreAgree:
)
assert loader_would_warn is (not expected)
assert hasattr(PluginLoader, "_warn_if_incompatible")
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------
# compatible_versions — the schema-required field, and the only one that can
# express an upper bound
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------
class TestCompatibleVersions:
@pytest.mark.parametrize("spec,core,expected", [
(">=2.0.0", "3.2.0", True),
(">=2.0.0", "1.9.9", False),
("<=3.0.0", "3.2.0", False),
("<=3.0.0", "2.9.0", True),
(">3.2.0", "3.2.0", False),
("<4.0.0", "3.2.0", True),
("3.2.0", "3.2.0", True), # bare == exact match
("3.2.0", "3.2.1", False),
("~3.2.0", "3.2.9", True), # patch-level only
("~3.2.0", "3.3.0", False),
("^3.2.0", "3.9.9", True), # minor + patch
("^3.2.0", "4.0.0", False),
("2.0.0 - 3.2.0", "3.2.0", True), # inclusive both ends
("2.0.0 - 3.2.0", "2.0.0", True),
("2.0.0 - 3.2.0", "3.2.1", False),
("v3.2.0", "3.2.0", True), # leading v tolerated
("3.2.0-beta.1", "3.2.0", True), # prerelease suffix ignored
])
def test_range_forms(self, spec, core, expected):
got = compatibility.satisfies_compatible_versions(
{"compatible_versions": [spec]}, compatibility.parse_semver(core))
assert got is expected, f"{spec!r} vs {core}"
def test_array_is_alternatives_not_conjunction(self):
"""Satisfying any one entry is enough — otherwise ['<2.0.0','>=3.0.0']
could never be satisfied by anything."""
m = {"compatible_versions": ["<2.0.0", ">=3.0.0"]}
assert compatibility.satisfies_compatible_versions(
m, compatibility.parse_semver("3.2.0")) is True
def test_absent_or_unparseable_is_no_evidence(self):
core = compatibility.parse_semver("3.2.0")
assert compatibility.satisfies_compatible_versions({}, core) is None
assert compatibility.satisfies_compatible_versions(
{"compatible_versions": []}, core) is None
assert compatibility.satisfies_compatible_versions(
{"compatible_versions": ["not a version"]}, core) is None
# One unparseable entry alongside a good one must not poison the result.
assert compatibility.satisfies_compatible_versions(
{"compatible_versions": ["garbage", ">=2.0.0"]}, core) is True
class TestMoreRestrictiveWins:
def test_upper_bound_blocks_a_core_that_clears_the_floor(self):
"""The gap this closes: the floor says 2.0.0 and the core is 3.2.0, so
the floor alone would allow it — but the plugin said it stops at 2.x."""
m = {"name": "Legacy Plugin",
"compatible_versions": ["2.0.0 - 2.9.9"],
"versions": [{"ledmatrix_min_version": "2.0.0"}]}
ok, reason = compatibility.check(m, "3.2.0")
assert ok is False
assert "2.0.0 - 2.9.9" in reason and "3.2.0" in reason
def test_floor_blocks_when_ranges_would_allow(self):
m = {"name": "Needs Newer",
"compatible_versions": [">=1.0.0"],
"versions": [{"ledmatrix_min_version": "9.9.9"}]}
ok, reason = compatibility.check(m, "3.2.0")
assert ok is False
assert "9.9.9" in reason
def test_both_satisfied_allows(self):
m = {"compatible_versions": [">=2.0.0"],
"versions": [{"ledmatrix_min_version": "2.0.0"}]}
assert compatibility.check(m, "3.2.0") == (True, None)
def test_untrustworthy_core_still_bypasses_both_checks(self):
"""A core reporting 1.0.0 fails `>=2.0.0`, which 41 of 42 published
manifests declare. Blocking there would empty the plugin store for
exactly the users who cannot be helped by it."""
m = {"compatible_versions": [">=2.0.0"],
"versions": [{"ledmatrix_min_version": "2.0.0"}]}
assert compatibility.check(m, "1.0.0") == (True, None)