fix(install): drop the iptables wildcard, and pin each grant properly

Review follow-up. Two findings, both right, and the first is a hole I opened
myself.

`NOPASSWD: iptables *` is a root shell for the web user by another name.
`iptables --modprobe=/path/to/anything` runs that path as root, so a wildcard
grant on iptables escalates rather than restricts. I added that rule while
fixing a permissions gap, which is a worse outcome than the gap. It is gone,
and a test now fails on any trailing-wildcard grant to a tool that can execute
another program -- iptables, nft, tcpdump, find, awk, sed, perl, python, env.

The other finding: checking only the binary made the coverage test far weaker
than it looked. With `sysctl` present anywhere in the allow-list, deleting the
`net.ipv4.ip_forward=0` grant still passed -- and the portal would then be
unable to restore forwarding on teardown. Each required command is now matched
in full, and each is mutation-checked individually, including that exact
single-line case.

Scope pulled in deliberately. The first version of this test tried to assert
that *every* sudo call in the codebase is granted. Run honestly, it showed the
portal also runs iptables, nft, `ip addr`, `ip link` and `cp` with arguments
built at runtime -- an interface name, a port. Those cannot be granted safely
in a sudoers file: the rule needs a trailing wildcard, and that is the
escalation above. Closing that half needs a privileged helper that builds the
rules itself and takes only an interface and a port, granted the way
safe_plugin_rm.sh already is. That is a design decision, not a one-line grant,
so the test now pins the four commands this change actually grants and the
docstring says plainly what it does not cover.

Better a narrow test that is true than a broad one that is not.

(cherry picked from commit 500cfbc9f4)
This commit is contained in:
ChuckBuilds
2026-08-20 03:54:09 -04:00
parent 324a4e43b1
commit 61d3e3d552
2 changed files with 97 additions and 104 deletions
+12 -5
View File
@@ -40,7 +40,6 @@ SUDOERS_FILE="/etc/sudoers.d/ledmatrix_wifi"
SYSCTL_PATH=$(command -v sysctl || echo /usr/sbin/sysctl)
NFT_PATH=$(command -v nft || echo /usr/sbin/nft)
RFKILL_PATH=$(command -v rfkill || echo /usr/sbin/rfkill)
IPTABLES_PATH=$(command -v iptables || echo /usr/sbin/iptables)
MKDIR_PATH=$(command -v mkdir || echo /usr/bin/mkdir)
# Create a temporary sudoers file using mktemp (handles permissions better)
@@ -84,11 +83,19 @@ $WEB_USER ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD: $SYSCTL_PATH -w net.ipv4.ip_forward=1
$WEB_USER ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD: $NFT_PATH add table ip ledmatrix
$WEB_USER ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD: $NFT_PATH delete table ip ledmatrix
$WEB_USER ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD: $RFKILL_PATH unblock wifi
# The portal also inserts and removes its own iptables rules and creates
# NetworkManager's dnsmasq drop-in directory. Wildcards rather than exact
# argument lists: those rules are built from the live interface name and port.
$WEB_USER ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD: $IPTABLES_PATH *
# NetworkManager's dnsmasq drop-in directory, exact path.
$WEB_USER ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD: $MKDIR_PATH -p /etc/NetworkManager/dnsmasq-shared.d
#
# iptables is deliberately NOT granted here. Its rules are built from the live
# interface name and port, so a rule covering them needs a trailing wildcard --
# and `iptables --modprobe=/path/to/anything` runs that path as root, so
# `NOPASSWD: iptables *` is a root shell for the web user by another name. That
# is a worse outcome than the gap it would close, which today is masked anyway
# by the blanket NOPASSWD rule on stock Pi images.
#
# Closing it safely means a wrapper script that builds the rules itself and
# takes only an interface and a port, granted the way safe_plugin_rm.sh already
# is. That belongs in its own change rather than being smuggled into this one.
# Allow copying hostapd and dnsmasq config files into place
$WEB_USER ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD: /usr/bin/cp /tmp/hostapd.conf /etc/hostapd/hostapd.conf
+85 -99
View File
@@ -1,23 +1,32 @@
"""Every sudo the code runs must be granted by an installer allow-list.
"""The captive portal's fixed-argument sudo calls must be granted.
The installers write two files -- /etc/sudoers.d/ledmatrix_web and
/etc/sudoers.d/ledmatrix_wifi -- each an explicit allow-list. Anything the code
calls with sudo that is not in one of them needs a password, which a service
cannot supply, so the call fails.
The installers write two allow-lists, /etc/sudoers.d/ledmatrix_web and
ledmatrix_wifi. A sudo call absent from both needs a password, which a service
cannot supply, so it fails.
That failure is invisible on a stock Raspberry Pi image, because
/etc/sudoers.d/010_pi-nopasswd grants the default user
Four such calls were ungranted, all of them captive-portal teardown/setup:
<user> ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD: ALL
sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_forward=0|1 wifi_manager.py:788, 883
nft add|delete table ip ledmatrix wifi_manager.py:835, 895
rfkill unblock wifi wifi_manager.py:1811
mkdir -p .../dnsmasq-shared.d wifi_manager.py:922
which masks every gap in both files. It only surfaces on a system where that
blanket rule has been removed, or where the service runs as a different user --
so a missing entry can sit there for a long time before anyone hits it.
It goes unnoticed because a stock Raspberry Pi image ships
/etc/sudoers.d/010_pi-nopasswd granting the default user
`ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD: ALL`, which satisfies every gap in both files. It only
bites once that blanket rule is removed or the service runs as another user.
One was: wifi_manager turns IP forwarding on while the captive portal's access
point is up and restores it afterwards, calling `sudo sysctl -w
net.ipv4.ip_forward=...`. Neither allow-list granted sysctl. On such a system
clients would associate to the AP and then fail to route.
Scope, deliberately narrow: this pins the four commands above, each of which
can be written out literally. The portal makes further sudo calls whose
arguments are built at runtime -- iptables and nft rules carrying an interface
name and a port, `ip addr`, `ip link` -- and those cannot be granted safely
here. A rule covering them needs a trailing wildcard, and
`iptables --modprobe=/path/to/anything` runs that path as root, so
`NOPASSWD: iptables *` is a root shell for the web user by another name.
Closing that half needs a privileged helper that builds the rules itself and
takes only an interface and a port, granted the way safe_plugin_rm.sh already
is. That is a design decision, not a one-line grant, and belongs in its own
change.
"""
import re
from pathlib import Path
@@ -29,63 +38,24 @@ INSTALLERS = (
ROOT / "first_time_install.sh",
ROOT / "scripts" / "install" / "configure_wifi_permissions.sh",
)
SOURCES = (ROOT / "src", ROOT / "web_interface")
# argv-style sudo calls: ["sudo", <binary-or-var>, "arg", ...]
CALL = re.compile(r"""\[\s*["']sudo["']\s*,\s*(?P<rest>[^\]]+)\]""")
#: Commands this change grants, each fully literal in the source.
REQUIRED = (
("sysctl", "-w", "net.ipv4.ip_forward=0"),
("sysctl", "-w", "net.ipv4.ip_forward=1"),
("nft", "add", "table", "ip", "ledmatrix"),
("nft", "delete", "table", "ip", "ledmatrix"),
("rfkill", "unblock", "wifi"),
("mkdir", "-p", "/etc/NetworkManager/dnsmasq-shared.d"),
)
#: Tools with an option that executes a program of the caller's choosing.
#: A trailing wildcard on any of these is a privilege escalation.
EXEC_CAPABLE = ("iptables", "ip6tables", "nft", "tcpdump", "find", "awk",
"sed", "perl", "python", "python3", "env")
def _first_two_args(rest):
"""The binary and its first argument, as written."""
parts = [p.strip() for p in rest.split(",")]
# Drop sudo's own flags: `sudo -n <tool>` is a call to <tool>, and
# treating "-n" as the binary reports a gap that does not exist.
flag = re.compile(r'[\'"]-[a-zA-Z]+[\'"]')
while parts and flag.fullmatch(parts[0]):
parts = parts[1:]
# Always two entries: `["sudo", "reboot"]` has no subcommand, and the
# caller unpacks a fixed pair.
out = []
for part in (parts + ["", ""])[:2]:
if not part:
out.append("")
continue
literal = re.fullmatch(r"""["'](.+)["']""", part)
if literal:
out.append(literal.group(1))
else:
# A variable such as sysctl_bin: reduce to the tool it resolves to.
out.append(part.split(".")[-1].replace("_bin", "").replace("_path", ""))
return out
def _sudo_calls():
found = {}
for base in SOURCES:
for path in base.rglob("*.py"):
text = path.read_text(encoding="utf-8", errors="replace")
for match in CALL.finditer(text):
args = _first_two_args(match.group("rest"))
if not args:
continue
line = text[:match.start()].count("\n") + 1
found.setdefault(tuple(args), f"{path.relative_to(ROOT)}:{line}")
return found
def _allowlisted_text():
"""The allow-list rules, with binary-path variables reduced to tool names.
The installers write rules like `$SYSTEMCTL_PATH enable ledmatrix.service`,
so matching on the literal "systemctl" finds nothing and every systemctl
rule looks absent. Normalise $FOO_PATH and /usr/bin/foo down to foo before
comparing, or the check reports gaps that are not there -- which it did on
the first run.
"""
# NOPASSWD lines only. Taking the whole script would let a variable
# definition such as NFT_PATH=$(command -v nft) satisfy the check on its
# own, which is how an earlier version of this test passed while the grant
# itself had been deleted.
def _grant_lines():
lines = []
for installer in INSTALLERS:
if not installer.is_file():
@@ -93,11 +63,22 @@ def _allowlisted_text():
for line in installer.read_text(encoding="utf-8", errors="replace").splitlines():
if "NOPASSWD:" in line:
lines.append(line.split("NOPASSWD:", 1)[1])
text = "\n".join(lines)
text = re.sub(r"\$\{?([A-Z][A-Z0-9_]*)_PATH\}?",
lambda m: m.group(1).lower(), text)
text = re.sub(r"/usr/(?:s?bin)/", "", text)
return text
return lines
def _normalised_grants():
"""Grants with binary-path variables reduced to tool names.
Rules are written as `$SYSCTL_PATH -w ...`, so matching the literal
"sysctl" finds nothing and every rule looks absent -- which is exactly how
an earlier version of this test reported six gaps that did not exist.
Only NOPASSWD lines are considered, because taking the whole script let a
variable definition such as NFT_PATH=$(command -v nft) satisfy the check on
its own while the grant itself had been deleted.
"""
text = "\n".join(_grant_lines())
text = re.sub(r"\$\{?([A-Z][A-Z0-9_]*)_PATH\}?", lambda m: m.group(1).lower(), text)
return re.sub(r"/usr/(?:s?bin)/", "", text)
def test_the_installers_are_present():
@@ -105,30 +86,35 @@ def test_the_installers_are_present():
assert not missing, f"installer(s) missing: {missing}"
def test_every_sudo_call_is_granted():
allow = _allowlisted_text()
calls = _sudo_calls()
assert calls, "no sudo calls found; the matcher has stopped working"
@pytest.mark.parametrize("command", REQUIRED, ids=lambda c: " ".join(c))
def test_the_command_is_granted(command):
"""Whole command, not just the binary.
ungranted = []
for (binary, first_arg), where in sorted(calls.items()):
# A rule mentions the tool and, where it takes a subcommand, that too.
if binary not in allow:
ungranted.append(f"{binary} ({where})")
Checking only the binary made this far weaker than it looked: with
`sysctl` present anywhere, deleting the ip_forward=0 grant still passed,
and the portal would then be unable to restore forwarding on teardown.
"""
pattern = r"\s+".join(re.escape(word) for word in command)
assert re.search(pattern, _normalised_grants()), (
f"no installer grants `{' '.join(command)}`")
def test_no_wildcard_on_a_tool_that_can_exec():
"""`NOPASSWD: iptables *` hands the web user root.
iptables --modprobe=/path runs that path as root. This caught a grant added
in this very change, which is why it is here.
"""
offenders = []
for rule in _grant_lines():
rule = rule.strip()
if not rule.endswith("*"):
continue
if first_arg and not first_arg.startswith("-"):
pattern = rf"{re.escape(binary)}\s+{re.escape(first_arg)}"
if binary in ("systemctl",) and not re.search(pattern, allow):
ungranted.append(f"{binary} {first_arg} ({where})")
assert not ungranted, (
"these run under sudo but no installer grants them; on a stock Pi the "
"blanket 010_pi-nopasswd rule hides this:\n " + "\n ".join(ungranted))
@pytest.mark.parametrize("needle", ["ip_forward"])
def test_the_captive_portal_forwarding_rule_is_granted(needle):
"""The specific gap this test was written for."""
assert needle in _allowlisted_text(), (
"no allow-list entry for sysctl ip_forward; the captive portal enables "
"forwarding while its AP is up and cannot without one")
haystack = rule.replace("_PATH", "").lower()
for tool in EXEC_CAPABLE:
if re.search(rf"(^|/|\s|\$){tool}(\s|$)", haystack):
offenders.append(rule)
break
assert not offenders, (
"wildcard grant on a tool that can execute another program:\n "
+ "\n ".join(offenders))