Nothing re-applies systemd units after the first install. `git pull` -- which
is what the web UI's update button runs -- brings a new template into the
checkout, but no code in web_interface/ or src/ copies it to
/etc/systemd/system, and nothing anywhere runs `systemctl daemon-reload`. The
unit that actually runs is whatever first_time_install.sh wrote on day one.
So every hardening added to a unit is inert on existing installs, silently.
Measured on a live rig:
installed /etc/systemd/system/ledmatrix.service 2026-08-06
template systemd/ledmatrix.service 2026-08-19
contents differ
with the practical result that the MemoryMax=85% the repo's template specifies
was not being enforced at all -- `systemctl show` reported
MemoryMax=infinity. Anyone reading the template would reasonably believe the
service was capped.
Startup now compares each installed unit against its substituted template and
warns when they differ, naming install_service.sh as the remedy.
A warning, not an error, and deliberately not a silent rewrite: editing files
under /etc and restarting services is the installer's job, not something a
display process should do to a machine while it is booting. Making it fatal
would also brick every development checkout whose unit is legitimately absent
or hand-edited.
Comparison ignores comments, blank lines and ordering. The template carries
explanatory comments the installed copy will not have, and systemd does not
care about order within a section, so a literal comparison would warn on every
boot and be ignored within a week.
Mutation-checked three ways: never reporting drift fails, making it fatal
fails, and -- after the first attempt missed it -- comparing raw text now fails
too. That last gap is worth noting: the comment-insensitivity tests originally
exercised the helper directly, so a comparison that stopped calling the helper
passed them all. The test that catches it goes through _validate_systemd_units.
29 startup-validator tests pass.
(cherry picked from commit cf521bdfd8)
ChuckBuilds
e1b445268d