Files
LEDMatrix/scripts/prove_security.py
T
66f9950a30 chore(ci): add security-audit tooling scripts (workflow files pushed separately) (#414)
* chore(ci): add security-audit workflow and plugin security-proof scripts

- scripts/prove_security.py, audit_plugins.py, generate_report.py --
  automated checks (dangerous eval()/exec() calls, dependency scanning,
  report generation) for plugins.
- .github/workflows/security-audit.yml + bandit.yaml -- CI wiring for
  the above plus gitleaks secret scanning and bandit static analysis.
- .github/workflows/tests.yml -- pytest matrix across Python 3.10-3.12.

Also fixes two Codacy findings while these files are freshly landing:
- prove_security.py: dropped a pointless f-string prefix with no
  placeholders.
- security-audit.yml: pinned gitleaks/gitleaks-action to a full commit
  SHA (matching this repo's existing pinning convention in test.yml)
  instead of the floating v2 tag.

Split out of the original chore/dead-code-removal commit, which had
accidentally bundled this in alongside unrelated dead-code deletions.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01KEZK1P1Q1fu5pcuVrkrCFZ

* chore: drop workflow files -- pushed separately (needs workflow OAuth scope)

* fix(security-tooling): address PR review findings across bandit.yaml, audit_plugins.py, generate_report.py, prove_security.py

bandit.yaml:
- Removed scripts/prove_security.py's file-level exclusion. Ran bandit
  directly to get ground truth: the real false positive is B105 (dict key
  "PASS" misread as password-like), not the eval/exec pattern the old
  comment claimed. Added a targeted # nosec B105 there, and found+fixed
  the identical pattern already present in generate_report.py.
- Left the repo-wide B607 skip as-is: confirmed via AST scan that properly
  narrowing it touches 100+ bare-name subprocess call sites across
  wifi_manager.py, store_manager.py, permission_utils.py, app.py, and
  start.py -- none of which are part of this PR. Out of proportion to fix
  here; flagged as a dedicated follow-up.

scripts/audit_plugins.py:
- SyntaxError/OSError while scanning a plugin file now report CRITICAL
  (blocking) instead of WARNING/INFO -- a file that couldn't be parsed or
  read was never actually checked for danger, so it must not silently
  pass the audit.
- --plugin <name> now tracks whether the requested plugin was found across
  all PLUGIN_BASE_DIRS and exits 1 with a clear error if not, instead of
  silently scanning zero plugins and reporting success.
- The AST visitor now tracks import aliases (import subprocess as sp;
  from builtins import eval as e) and resolves them before checking
  against dangerous APIs, closing a straightforward evasion of every
  PLUGIN-001 through PLUGIN-005 check. Verified against both aliased and
  unaliased evasion patterns.

scripts/generate_report.py:
- _md_table_row now escapes pipe characters and normalizes newlines in
  every cell, so scanner-controlled content (a matched secret, a bandit
  issue_text) can't corrupt the Markdown table structure.
- _load now distinguishes "artifact missing/malformed" from "valid empty
  result": each summarizer returns an availability flag, and main() now
  reports INCOMPLETE (not PASSED) with exit code 1 when any artifact is
  unavailable, instead of silently folding it in as 0 findings.
- Gitleaks suppression now uses exact-match placeholder values (pulled
  from the actual config_secrets.template.json) plus a template-path
  allowlist, replacing broad substring checks that could hide a real
  secret containing something like "example.com" as part of its value.

scripts/prove_security.py:
- T1b (dangerous plugin calls): a file that fails to parse/read now
  reports CRITICAL with the exception details instead of being silently
  swallowed by `except (SyntaxError, OSError): pass`.
- T6 (Docker hardening): base images must now be pinned to an @sha256
  digest; a specific tag like python:3.12 is mutable and is now correctly
  flagged as unpinned, not just missing tags or :latest.
- T2a (API surface): no config mechanism for enforcing local-only access
  exists in this codebase today (app.py hardcodes host='0.0.0.0'), so the
  "environment-aware" check as described isn't buildable without adding
  new config infrastructure -- out of scope here. Applied the achievable
  part: upgraded from INFO to WARNING, since enforcement can never
  currently be confirmed.
- T1a (zip-slip): replaced the whole-file substring check with an AST
  walk that finds every extract()/extractall() call and confirms an
  is_relative_to() guard + "Zip-slip detected" log precede it in the same
  function. Verified it still passes on the real store_manager.py (both
  the per-member and validate-then-bulk-extract call sites) and correctly
  flags a synthetic unguarded extractall().
- T3a (hardcoded secrets): violation details no longer include the
  matched credential text -- only file, line, pattern type, and a
  redacted SHA-256 fingerprint, so a real finding doesn't get published
  into CI logs/artifacts/PR comments with wider exposure than the
  original leak. Verified with a synthetic secret that no raw content
  reaches the output.

Validated: all four files compile; bandit scans all three scripts clean
(2 legitimate targeted suppressions, 0 unaddressed findings); each new/
changed code path exercised directly (alias evasion, unmatched --plugin,
missing/malformed/valid-empty artifacts, digest-pinning, zip-slip
guard/no-guard, secret redaction); full audit_plugins.py -> prove_security.py
-> generate_report.py pipeline run end-to-end producing a correct report.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01KEZK1P1Q1fu5pcuVrkrCFZ

* fix(security-tooling): address follow-up review findings on PR #414

scripts/generate_report.py:
- Added an explicit `object` type annotation to _md_sanitize_cell's value
  parameter -- it deliberately accepts any stringifiable value (calls
  str(value) unconditionally), so `object` reflects its actual contract
  more accurately than leaving it untyped.

scripts/prove_security.py:
- Dockerfile FROM-line parsing: renamed the comprehension variable `l` to
  `line` (ambiguous single-letter name). More importantly, fixed a real
  false-positive: `FROM --platform=<platform> <image>` was reading the
  --platform= flag itself as the image token, so a properly digest-pinned
  image behind a platform flag was incorrectly reported as unpinned.
  Verified against platform+digest, platform+tag-only, and digest+AS-alias
  Dockerfiles.

scripts/audit_plugins.py:
- Consolidated visit_Call's dangerous-API detection: previously, alias
  resolution only covered ast.Name calls for eval/exec/compile and
  ast.Attribute calls for subprocess/os.system, missing from-imported
  subprocess/os functions called as bare names (from subprocess import
  run as prun; prun(cmd, shell=True) or from os import system as s;
  s(cmd)). Added _resolve_call_target() to resolve both call shapes to a
  single fully-qualified target, then run all five PLUGIN-00x checks
  against that one resolved value. Verified against 10 evasion
  combinations (from-import aliases, direct/attribute calls, aliased
  module imports) and confirmed zero false positives on benign os/
  subprocess usage without shell=True.

Validated: all three files compile, bandit scans clean (same 2 legitimate
suppressions as before, 0 new findings), audit_plugins.py/prove_security.py
re-run against the real repo with no regressions from the prior fix pass.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01KEZK1P1Q1fu5pcuVrkrCFZ

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-15 14:33:17 -04:00

594 lines
26 KiB
Python
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
LEDMatrix Security Proof Tests
Automated proofs that run in CI to verify security properties hold on every
commit. Inspired by the Huntarr security review approach of using standard
tooling to confirm specific vulnerability classes are absent.
Usage:
python scripts/prove_security.py
python scripts/prove_security.py --verbose
python scripts/prove_security.py --output results.json
Exit code: 1 only if CRITICAL findings are detected. Warnings are reported
but do not block CI.
"""
import ast
import argparse
import hashlib
import json
import re
import sys
from dataclasses import dataclass, asdict
from pathlib import Path
PROJECT_ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent
# ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
# Result dataclass
# ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
@dataclass
class TestResult:
test_id: str
severity: str # PASS | INFO | WARNING | CRITICAL | SKIP
message: str
details: str = ""
def to_dict(self) -> dict:
return asdict(self)
@property
def icon(self) -> str:
return {
"PASS": "✅", # nosec B105 - severity label, not a credential
"INFO": "️ ",
"WARNING": "⚠️ ",
"CRITICAL": "🚨",
"SKIP": "⏭️ ",
}.get(self.severity, "❓")
# ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
# T1: Plugin Loading / Zip Slip
# ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
def test_t1a_zip_slip_protection() -> TestResult:
"""
Verify that zip-slip protection actually guards zip extraction in
store_manager.py.
A whole-file substring check for "is_relative_to"/"Zip-slip detected"
would pass even if the guard existed somewhere unrelated, or covered
only one of several extract()/extractall() call sites. Instead, this
walks the AST: for every extract()/extractall() call, it confirms an
is_relative_to() check (and the "Zip-slip detected" log) appears
earlier in that same enclosing function -- validate-then-bulk-extract
(validate every member, then call extractall() only after all passed)
counts as protecting the call, since it covers the same member list.
"""
store_manager = PROJECT_ROOT / "src" / "plugin_system" / "store_manager.py"
if not store_manager.exists():
return TestResult("T1a", "CRITICAL",
"store_manager.py not found",
f"Expected at {store_manager}")
content = store_manager.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
try:
tree = ast.parse(content, filename=str(store_manager))
except SyntaxError as exc:
return TestResult("T1a", "CRITICAL",
"store_manager.py could not be parsed",
str(exc))
extraction_sites = 0
unprotected: list[str] = []
for func in ast.walk(tree):
if not isinstance(func, (ast.FunctionDef, ast.AsyncFunctionDef)):
continue
extract_calls = [
node for node in ast.walk(func)
if isinstance(node, ast.Call) and isinstance(node.func, ast.Attribute)
and node.func.attr in ("extract", "extractall")
]
if not extract_calls:
continue
extraction_sites += len(extract_calls)
guard_lines = [
n.lineno for n in ast.walk(func)
if isinstance(n, ast.Attribute) and n.attr == "is_relative_to"
]
has_zip_slip_log = any(
isinstance(n, ast.Constant) and isinstance(n.value, str)
and "Zip-slip detected" in n.value
for n in ast.walk(func)
)
for call in extract_calls:
guarded = has_zip_slip_log and any(g < call.lineno for g in guard_lines)
if not guarded:
unprotected.append(
f"{func.name}() line {call.lineno}: {call.func.attr}() call not "
f"clearly preceded by an is_relative_to() guard + Zip-slip log "
f"in the same function"
)
if extraction_sites == 0:
return TestResult("T1a", "WARNING",
"No zipfile extract()/extractall() calls found in store_manager.py",
"Verify plugin installation no longer extracts zip archives, "
"or that this check still targets the right file")
if unprotected:
return TestResult("T1a", "CRITICAL",
f"{len(unprotected)} of {extraction_sites} zip extraction "
f"call(s) not clearly guarded",
"; ".join(unprotected))
return TestResult("T1a", "PASS",
"Zip-slip protection verified",
f"All {extraction_sites} extract()/extractall() call(s) in "
f"store_manager.py are preceded by an is_relative_to() guard "
f"with a Zip-slip log in the same function")
def test_t1b_dangerous_plugin_calls() -> list[TestResult]:
"""
Scan plugin directories for dangerous function calls (eval, exec).
These represent arbitrary code execution risks in plugin code.
"""
results = []
plugin_dirs = [
PROJECT_ROOT / "plugins",
PROJECT_ROOT / "plugin-repos",
]
violations: list[str] = []
files_scanned = 0
scan_errors: list[str] = []
for base in plugin_dirs:
if not base.exists():
continue
for plugin_dir in sorted(base.iterdir()):
if not plugin_dir.is_dir() or plugin_dir.name.startswith(('.', '_')):
continue
for py_file in plugin_dir.rglob("*.py"):
files_scanned += 1
try:
source = py_file.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
tree = ast.parse(source, filename=str(py_file))
for node in ast.walk(tree):
if isinstance(node, ast.Call) and isinstance(node.func, ast.Name):
if node.func.id in ("eval", "exec"):
rel = py_file.relative_to(PROJECT_ROOT)
violations.append(
f"{rel}:{node.lineno}{node.func.id}() call")
except (SyntaxError, OSError) as exc:
# A file we couldn't parse/read was never actually
# scanned for eval()/exec() -- that must block this
# test, not silently pass as if it were clean.
rel = py_file.relative_to(PROJECT_ROOT)
scan_errors.append(f"{rel}{type(exc).__name__}: {exc}")
if scan_errors:
results.append(TestResult(
"T1b", "CRITICAL",
f"{len(scan_errors)} plugin file(s) could not be scanned for eval()/exec()",
"; ".join(scan_errors[:10])
))
if violations:
results.append(TestResult(
"T1b", "CRITICAL",
f"Dangerous function calls found in plugins ({len(violations)} instance(s))",
"; ".join(violations[:10])
))
elif not scan_errors:
results.append(TestResult(
"T1b", "PASS",
"No eval()/exec() calls found in plugins",
f"{files_scanned} plugin Python files scanned"
))
return results
# ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
# T2: API Surface Inventory
# ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
def test_t2a_api_surface_inventory() -> TestResult:
"""
Document the API surface area.
This app intentionally has no authentication (local-only Raspberry Pi
design, documented in web_interface/app.py). This test produces an
inventory for audit purposes and warns only if the design-intent comment
is removed from app.py (which would indicate someone deleted the rationale
without adding auth, rather than a deliberate undocumented change).
"""
api_file = PROJECT_ROOT / "web_interface" / "blueprints" / "api_v3.py"
app_file = PROJECT_ROOT / "web_interface" / "app.py"
if not api_file.exists():
return TestResult("T2a", "WARNING", "api_v3.py not found", str(api_file))
api_content = api_file.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
routes = re.findall(r"@api_v3\.route\('([^']+)'", api_content)
csrf_documented = False
if app_file.exists():
app_content = app_file.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
csrf_documented = "CSRF protection disabled for local-only" in app_content
summary = (
f"{len(routes)} API routes in api_v3.py. "
f"No auth decorators (intentional local-only design). "
f"CSRF disabled: {'YES — design intent documented in app.py' if csrf_documented else 'YES — but design intent comment NOT found in app.py'}. "
f"Rate limiting: 1000/min."
)
if not csrf_documented:
return TestResult(
"T2a", "WARNING",
"CSRF is disabled but the design-intent comment is missing from app.py",
"Add the rationale comment back, or add proper CSRF protection if "
"the app is now internet-facing"
)
# There is currently no config mechanism that actually enforces the
# local-only boundary the design-intent comment describes -- app.py
# hardcodes host='0.0.0.0' unconditionally, so nothing here can confirm
# this deployment is in fact LAN-only. Reporting this as mere INFO
# understates that: an unauthenticated, CSRF-disabled API surface is a
# real risk the moment this ever runs somewhere other than a home LAN,
# documented rationale or not.
return TestResult(
"T2a", "WARNING",
"API surface has no auth and CSRF disabled; enforcement of the "
"documented local-only boundary cannot be confirmed",
summary
)
# ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
# T3: Secrets & Credential Handling
# ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
# Patterns that suggest real credentials (must be >8 chars, not placeholders)
_SECRET_PATTERNS = [
(r'(?i)password\s*=\s*["\'](?!none|empty|placeholder|example|test|default|""|'')[^"\']{8,}["\']', "WARNING", "password"),
(r'(?i)api[_-]?key\s*=\s*["\'](?!none|empty|placeholder|YOUR_|example|test)[^"\']{16,}["\']', "WARNING", "api_key"),
(r'(?i)secret\s*=\s*["\'](?!none|empty|placeholder|YOUR_|example|test)[^"\']{16,}["\']', "WARNING", "secret"),
# Real GitHub token pattern
(r'ghp_[a-zA-Z0-9]{36}', "CRITICAL", "github_token"),
# Generic long bearer tokens
(r'Bearer\s+[a-zA-Z0-9\-_\.]{32,}', "WARNING", "bearer_token"),
]
_TEMPLATE_SKIP_STRINGS = [
"YOUR_", "PLACEHOLDER", "_HERE", "example.com", "config_secrets.template",
"prove_security", # this file itself
]
_SCAN_DIRS = ["src", "web_interface", "scripts"]
def test_t3a_hardcoded_secrets() -> TestResult:
"""Scan source code for hardcoded credentials."""
violations: list[str] = []
for dir_name in _SCAN_DIRS:
scan_dir = PROJECT_ROOT / dir_name
if not scan_dir.exists():
continue
for py_file in scan_dir.rglob("*.py"):
# Skip test files and this script
if "test" in str(py_file).lower() or "prove_security" in str(py_file):
continue
try:
content = py_file.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
except OSError:
continue
for pattern, severity, pattern_type in _SECRET_PATTERNS:
for match in re.finditer(pattern, content):
line_content = match.group(0)
# Skip lines containing template placeholder strings.
# line_content is only used for this in-memory check --
# it must never be stored or included in output below.
if any(skip in line_content for skip in _TEMPLATE_SKIP_STRINGS):
continue
rel = py_file.relative_to(PROJECT_ROOT)
line_no = content[: match.start()].count("\n") + 1
# Redacted fingerprint lets the same finding be recognized
# across scans without ever reporting the matched
# credential itself (which would otherwise get published
# into CI logs, JSON artifacts, and PR comments -- wider
# exposure than the original leak).
fingerprint = hashlib.sha256(line_content.encode()).hexdigest()[:12]
violations.append(
f"[{severity}] {rel}:{line_no}{pattern_type} "
f"(fingerprint {fingerprint})"
)
critical_violations = [v for v in violations if "[CRITICAL]" in v]
if critical_violations:
return TestResult(
"T3a", "CRITICAL",
f"Hardcoded secrets found ({len(critical_violations)} critical)",
"; ".join(critical_violations[:5])
)
if violations:
return TestResult(
"T3a", "WARNING",
f"Potential hardcoded secrets found ({len(violations)} instance(s))",
"; ".join(violations[:5])
)
return TestResult("T3a", "PASS", "No hardcoded secrets detected",
f"Scanned {', '.join(_SCAN_DIRS)}")
def test_t3b_plaintext_password_storage() -> TestResult:
"""
Check for user account password storage without hashing.
The LEDMatrix app has no user account system, so this should produce INFO.
It would only CRITICAL if someone added user auth and stored passwords without hashing.
We require all three of: a password *variable assignment or DB operation*,
a clear storage call (INSERT / db commit / ORM save), and no hashing lib present
— to avoid false positives from files that contain 'password' for WiFi handling
and '.save()' for image/file saving in unrelated functions.
"""
hashing_libs = ["bcrypt", "argon2", "pbkdf2", "scrypt",
"generate_password_hash", "hashpw", "make_password"]
# Patterns that indicate password being stored in a database / ORM context.
# Must be specific enough to avoid matching set.add(), file.save(), etc.
db_storage_patterns = ["INSERT INTO", "db.session", "session.add(", "session.commit(", "orm.save"]
password_storage_found = False
for dir_name in _SCAN_DIRS:
scan_dir = PROJECT_ROOT / dir_name
if not scan_dir.exists():
continue
for py_file in scan_dir.rglob("*.py"):
try:
content = py_file.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
except OSError:
continue
# Require DB/ORM context specifically — not just any .save() call
if ("password" in content.lower() and
any(store in content for store in db_storage_patterns) and
not any(h in content for h in hashing_libs)):
password_storage_found = True
if password_storage_found:
return TestResult(
"T3b", "CRITICAL",
"Potential plaintext password storage in database/ORM detected",
"Found password + database storage operations without a recognized hashing library"
)
return TestResult("T3b", "INFO",
"No plaintext password storage detected",
"App has no user account system — expected result")
# ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
# T4: Path Traversal
# ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
def test_t4a_path_traversal() -> TestResult:
"""
Verify static file serving uses send_from_directory (safe) rather than
open() with user-supplied paths. Also checks for extractall() calls that
lack the is_relative_to() guard.
"""
issues: list[str] = []
app_file = PROJECT_ROOT / "web_interface" / "app.py"
if app_file.exists():
content = app_file.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
# The file-serve route should use send_from_directory or commonpath
if "send_from_directory" not in content and "commonpath" not in content:
issues.append("app.py: file-serve routes may not use send_from_directory/commonpath")
# Check all extractall() calls have a preceding is_relative_to guard
for py_file in (PROJECT_ROOT / "src").rglob("*.py"):
try:
content = py_file.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
except OSError:
continue
if "extractall(" in content and "is_relative_to" not in content:
rel = py_file.relative_to(PROJECT_ROOT)
issues.append(f"{rel}: extractall() without is_relative_to() guard")
if issues:
return TestResult(
"T4a", "WARNING",
f"Potential path traversal patterns found ({len(issues)})",
"; ".join(issues)
)
return TestResult("T4a", "PASS",
"Path traversal mitigations verified",
"send_from_directory/commonpath used for file serving; "
"extractall() calls have is_relative_to() guards")
# ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
# T5: Auth Bypass Patterns
# ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
def test_t5a_auth_bypass_patterns() -> TestResult:
"""
Look for broken auth bypass patterns — not the intentional no-auth design
(T2a covers that), but patterns that suggest auth was INTENDED to exist
but has an exploitable bypass: broad substring matching, debug-mode skips,
or if-True conditions.
"""
bypass_signals = [
(r'if\s+True\s*:', "if True: bypass"),
(r'if\s+debug\s*:', "debug-mode auth skip"),
(r'request\.path\s+in\s+', "substring path matching in auth (Huntarr pattern)"),
(r'EXEMPT_ROUTES\s*=', "exempt routes list"),
]
findings: list[str] = []
for dir_name in ["src", "web_interface"]:
scan_dir = PROJECT_ROOT / dir_name
if not scan_dir.exists():
continue
for py_file in scan_dir.rglob("*.py"):
try:
content = py_file.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
except OSError:
continue
for pattern, label in bypass_signals:
if re.search(pattern, content):
# Only flag if the file also contains auth-related terms
if any(auth in content.lower() for auth in
["auth", "login", "authenticate", "token", "permission"]):
rel = py_file.relative_to(PROJECT_ROOT)
findings.append(f"{rel}: {label}")
if findings:
return TestResult(
"T5a", "WARNING",
f"Potential auth bypass patterns found ({len(findings)})",
"; ".join(findings[:5])
)
return TestResult("T5a", "PASS",
"No auth bypass patterns detected",
"Checked src/ and web_interface/ for bypass signals")
# ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
# T6: Docker / Container Hardening
# ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
def test_t6_docker_hardening() -> TestResult:
"""Container security — skipped if no Dockerfile exists."""
dockerfile = PROJECT_ROOT / "Dockerfile"
if not dockerfile.exists():
return TestResult("T6", "SKIP",
"No Dockerfile found — container security scan not applicable",
"If Docker support is added in future, enable hadolint/trivy scanning "
"in .github/workflows/security-audit.yml")
content = dockerfile.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
issues: list[str] = []
# Check for non-root USER directive
user_lines = [l for l in content.splitlines() if l.strip().startswith("USER")]
if not user_lines or user_lines[-1].strip() == "USER root":
issues.append("Container runs as root — use USER directive to drop privileges")
# Check for pinned base image tags. A tag (even a specific version, not
# just :latest) is mutable -- the same tag can point to a different
# image later. Only a @sha256 digest is truly immutable/reproducible.
from_lines = [line for line in content.splitlines() if line.strip().startswith("FROM")]
for from_line in from_lines:
parts = from_line.split()
# FROM [--platform=<platform>] <image> [AS <name>] -- skip an
# optional --platform= flag so it's never mistaken for the image
# token itself (which would falsely report it as unpinned).
image_parts = [p for p in parts[1:] if not p.startswith("--platform=")]
if image_parts:
image = image_parts[0]
if "@sha256:" not in image:
issues.append(f"Base image not pinned to a digest: {image}")
if issues:
return TestResult("T6", "WARNING",
f"Dockerfile hardening issues ({len(issues)})",
"; ".join(issues))
return TestResult("T6", "PASS", "Dockerfile hardening checks passed", "")
# ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
# Runner
# ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
def main() -> int:
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(
description="LEDMatrix security proof tests",
formatter_class=argparse.RawDescriptionHelpFormatter,
)
parser.add_argument("--output", "-o", default=None,
help="Write JSON results to this file")
parser.add_argument("--verbose", "-v", action="store_true",
help="Show details for each check")
args = parser.parse_args()
print("=" * 60)
print("LEDMatrix Security Proof Tests")
print(f"Project root: {PROJECT_ROOT}")
print("=" * 60)
all_results: list[TestResult] = []
# Run all test groups
all_results.append(test_t1a_zip_slip_protection())
all_results.extend(test_t1b_dangerous_plugin_calls())
all_results.append(test_t2a_api_surface_inventory())
all_results.append(test_t3a_hardcoded_secrets())
all_results.append(test_t3b_plaintext_password_storage())
all_results.append(test_t4a_path_traversal())
all_results.append(test_t5a_auth_bypass_patterns())
all_results.append(test_t6_docker_hardening())
# Print results
print()
for r in all_results:
line = f" {r.icon} [{r.severity:<8}] {r.test_id}: {r.message}"
print(line)
if args.verbose and r.details:
print(f" {r.details}")
# Tally
critical = [r for r in all_results if r.severity == "CRITICAL"]
warnings = [r for r in all_results if r.severity == "WARNING"]
passed = [r for r in all_results if r.severity == "PASS"]
skipped = [r for r in all_results if r.severity == "SKIP"]
print()
print(f" Results: {len(passed)} PASS {len(warnings)} WARN "
f"{len(critical)} CRITICAL {len(skipped)} SKIP")
# Write JSON output
if args.output:
output_data = [r.to_dict() for r in all_results]
Path(args.output).write_text(
json.dumps(output_data, indent=2), encoding="utf-8"
)
print(f" Results written to: {args.output}")
if critical:
print(f"\n 🚨 {len(critical)} CRITICAL issue(s) found — blocking")
return 1
if warnings:
print(f"\n ⚠️ {len(warnings)} warning(s) found — non-blocking")
print("\n ✅ All checks passed (warnings are non-blocking)")
return 0
if __name__ == "__main__":
sys.exit(main())