Compare commits

..
Author SHA1 Message Date
ChuckBuildsandClaude Opus 5 95bd8a1a67 fix(web): stop an unrelated config edit from erasing a plugin's secret
Saving any field on a plugin's config form destroyed that plugin's stored
credential. On a rig with a weather API key, changing the city silently
emptied the key, and the plugin stopped working at the next fetch with no
indication why.

The path had no guard at any step. The config partial masks secrets before
rendering (pages_v3.py:740), so the browser posts them back blank; _parse_value
deliberately preserves "" for optional string fields; separate_secrets routes
that "" into secrets_config, which is a truthy dict; deep_merge writes it over
the stored value; save_raw_file_content persists it.

The blank does not even need the round-trip. merge_with_defaults injects the
schema's api_key default ("") into every save, so a client that never sends
the field at all still erases it. test_secret_count_message_counts_top_level_keys
was counting exactly that injected blank as a saved secret field -- the visible
edge of the bug, pinned as expected behaviour.

remove_empty_secrets() already existed for this, with seven unit tests and a
docstring describing this precise scenario ("clients will send those empty
strings back ... so that existing stored secrets are not overwritten with
blanks"). It was never wired into a call site. This wires it into both save
paths that merge into the secrets file.

A blank now means "unchanged" rather than "delete", which is the same contract
the helper's tests already describe. The cost is that a secret can no longer be
cleared by emptying the field; clearing needs its own affordance, since a
control that erases credentials as a side effect of ordinary edits is not one.

Verified by reverting the guard: the new round-trip test then fails with the
stored key read back as ''. 262 web tests pass with it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01STMbQE4YctTacQXfbYqKuW
2026-08-20 05:53:51 -04:00
4 changed files with 48 additions and 113 deletions
-12
View File
@@ -8,18 +8,6 @@ Type=simple
User=root
WorkingDirectory=__PROJECT_ROOT_DIR__
Environment=PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1
# glibc gives each allocating thread its own malloc arena, up to 8 x CPU count,
# and an arena that has grown is never handed back to the OS. This process runs
# 9 threads on a 3-core Pi, so the ceiling is 24 arenas -- and a rig measured at
# 1030 MB resident held 23 large anonymous mappings on 64 MB-aligned addresses,
# 920 MB of them, while the live data it was actually holding (widest scroll
# strip seen: 35,746 x 64) accounts for roughly 15 MB. That gap is arena bloat,
# not leaked objects: RSS was flat across repeated sampling, not climbing.
#
# Capping the arenas trades a little allocator concurrency for a large amount of
# resident memory on a device that has neither to spare. 2 is the usual value;
# raise it if frame times regress.
Environment=MALLOC_ARENA_MAX=2
ExecStart=/usr/bin/python3 __PROJECT_ROOT_DIR__/run.py
# Restart=always, not on-failure: run.py exiting 0 (a clean shutdown path taken
# for a reason that no longer applies, e.g. a config reload) would otherwise leave
-95
View File
@@ -1,95 +0,0 @@
"""The display unit must cap glibc's malloc arenas.
glibc hands each allocating thread its own malloc arena, up to 8 x CPU count,
and an arena that has grown is never returned to the OS. This process runs
threads for the render loop, the update workers and the background fetchers, so
on a 3-core Pi the ceiling is 24 arenas.
Measured on a live rig, 2.5 hours in:
RSS 1030 MB
Private_Dirty 988 MB
anonymous mappings > 10 MB 23 (ceiling is 8 x 3 = 24)
largest few 104, 79, 66, 63, 63 MB, on 64 MB-aligned addresses
against live data that accounts for perhaps 15 MB -- the widest scroll strip
observed was 35,746 x 64, about 7 MB as RGB and the same again for its numpy
mirror. Repeated sampling showed RSS flat between 990 and 1030 MB rather than
climbing, so this is arena bloat rather than a leak: memory Python has freed
but glibc is holding per-arena.
The device had 59 MB free at the time.
Capping the arena count trades a little allocator concurrency for that resident
memory. The render loop is latency-sensitive, so if p99 frame time regresses the
right response is to raise this rather than remove it.
"""
import re
from pathlib import Path
import pytest
UNIT = (Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent / "systemd" / "ledmatrix.service")
#: The value the unit is expected to carry. 2 is the usual choice for a
#: threaded Python process; 1-4 all keep some of the saving, but only one of
#: them is what this project ships.
EXPECTED_ARENA_MAX = 2
def _environment(unit_text):
return dict(
line.split("=", 2)[1:3] if line.count("=") >= 2 else (line.split("=", 1)[1], "")
for line in unit_text.splitlines()
if line.startswith("Environment=")
)
def test_the_unit_exists():
assert UNIT.is_file(), f"{UNIT} is missing"
def test_malloc_arena_max_is_capped():
env = _environment(UNIT.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
assert "MALLOC_ARENA_MAX" in env, (
"the display unit does not cap glibc arenas; on a 3-core Pi the default "
"ceiling is 24 and a measured rig held 23 of them, 920 MB"
)
value = int(env["MALLOC_ARENA_MAX"])
# Pinned, not a range. A range let a change to 4 -- which hands most of the
# saving back -- pass unnoticed, which was the point of the finding that
# prompted this. Raising it is a legitimate response to a frame-time
# regression, but it should be a visible edit here rather than a silent
# drift, so the number lives in one place and changing it shows up in
# review.
assert value == EXPECTED_ARENA_MAX, (
f"MALLOC_ARENA_MAX={value}, expected {EXPECTED_ARENA_MAX}. If this was "
"raised deliberately because frame times regressed, update "
"EXPECTED_ARENA_MAX here and say so in the commit."
)
def test_the_reason_is_recorded_next_to_it():
"""A bare tuning knob invites removal by whoever meets it next."""
text = UNIT.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
index = text.index("Environment=MALLOC_ARENA_MAX")
preamble = text[:index].splitlines()[-12:]
comment = "\n".join(line for line in preamble if line.startswith("#"))
assert "arena" in comment.lower(), "no explanation precedes the setting"
assert re.search(r"\d", comment), (
"the explanation cites no measurement, so a reader cannot tell whether "
"it still applies to their hardware"
)
@pytest.mark.parametrize("unit", ["ledmatrix.service"])
def test_the_unit_still_parses_as_ini(unit):
"""systemd will refuse a malformed unit, and the panel stays dark."""
import configparser
path = UNIT.parent / unit
parser = configparser.ConfigParser(strict=False)
# systemd allows repeated keys; ConfigParser needs them merged, not rejected.
parser.read_string(path.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
assert parser.has_section("Service")
assert parser.has_option("Service", "ExecStart")
@@ -194,15 +194,46 @@ class TestSavePluginConfig:
def test_secret_count_message_counts_top_level_keys(self, env):
# Pinned: the "(N secret field(s))" message counts TOP-LEVEL keys of
# the separated secrets dict. Here that is 2: the posted accounts
# array (all its item tokens count as ONE key) plus the schema's
# api_key default ("") that merge_with_defaults adds before
# separation.
# the separated secrets dict. Here that is 1: the posted accounts
# array, whose item tokens all count as ONE key.
#
# It was 2 before blank secrets were dropped, the second being the
# schema's api_key default (""), which merge_with_defaults adds to
# every save. Counting it was the visible edge of a real bug: that
# injected blank was merged over the stored api_key, so saving any
# unrelated field destroyed the credential. See
# test_an_unrelated_edit_does_not_erase_a_stored_secret.
resp = self._save(env, {
"accounts": [{"name": "a", "token": "t"}],
})
message = resp.get_json()["message"]
assert "(2 secret field(s) saved to config_secrets.json)" in message
assert "(1 secret field(s) saved to config_secrets.json)" in message
def test_an_unrelated_edit_does_not_erase_a_stored_secret(self, env):
"""Editing one field must not wipe the plugin's API key.
The config form renders secrets masked, so the browser posts them
back blank; merge_with_defaults injects a blank api_key even when
the client omits it entirely. Either way a "" reached the secrets
file and deep_merge wrote it over the stored credential.
"""
assert self._save(env, {"api_key": "REAL-KEY-0123456789",
"city": "Austin"}).status_code == 200
assert _on_disk(env.secrets_file)[PLUGIN_ID]["api_key"] == \
"REAL-KEY-0123456789"
# the user changes the city; the masked api_key rides along blank
assert self._save(env, {"api_key": "", "city": "Dallas"}).status_code == 200
assert _on_disk(env.secrets_file)[PLUGIN_ID]["api_key"] == \
"REAL-KEY-0123456789", "an unrelated edit destroyed the API key"
assert env.fresh_load()[PLUGIN_ID]["city"] == "Dallas"
def test_a_secret_can_still_be_changed(self, env):
"""Dropping blanks must not stop a real new value from being saved."""
self._save(env, {"api_key": "first-key"})
self._save(env, {"api_key": "second-key"})
assert _on_disk(env.secrets_file)[PLUGIN_ID]["api_key"] == "second-key"
def test_resave_replaces_stored_secrets_list_wholesale(self, env):
# Characterized: api_v3's deep_merge intentionally replaces lists,
+12 -1
View File
@@ -21,7 +21,8 @@ logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# Import new infrastructure
from src.web_interface.api_helpers import success_response, error_response, validate_request_json
from src.web_interface.errors import ErrorCode
from src.web_interface.secret_helpers import find_secret_fields, separate_secrets
from src.web_interface.secret_helpers import (find_secret_fields, remove_empty_secrets,
separate_secrets)
from src.web_interface.error_handler import describe_exception, redact_text
from src.plugin_system.operation_types import OperationType
from src.web_interface.validators import (
@@ -1216,6 +1217,11 @@ def save_main_config():
# Separate secrets from regular config (same logic as save_plugin_config)
regular_config, secrets_config = separate_secrets(plugin_config, secret_fields)
# The config form renders secrets masked, so every save posts
# them back blank. Without this the blank is merged over the
# stored value and the credential is destroyed by the act of
# changing an unrelated setting. A blank means "unchanged".
secrets_config = remove_empty_secrets(secrets_config)
# PRE-PROCESSING: Preserve 'enabled' state if not in regular_config
# This prevents overwriting the enabled state when saving config from a form that doesn't include the toggle
@@ -5599,6 +5605,11 @@ def save_plugin_config():
# Separate secrets from regular config (handles nested configs and
# array-item secrets — see src/web_interface/secret_helpers.py)
regular_config, secrets_config = separate_secrets(plugin_config, secret_fields)
# The config form renders secrets masked, so every save posts
# them back blank. Without this the blank is merged over the
# stored value and the credential is destroyed by the act of
# changing an unrelated setting. A blank means "unchanged".
secrets_config = remove_empty_secrets(secrets_config)
# Get current configs
current_config = api_v3.config_manager.load_config()