Compare commits

..
Author SHA1 Message Date
ChuckBuildsandClaude Opus 5 95bd8a1a67 fix(web): stop an unrelated config edit from erasing a plugin's secret
Saving any field on a plugin's config form destroyed that plugin's stored
credential. On a rig with a weather API key, changing the city silently
emptied the key, and the plugin stopped working at the next fetch with no
indication why.

The path had no guard at any step. The config partial masks secrets before
rendering (pages_v3.py:740), so the browser posts them back blank; _parse_value
deliberately preserves "" for optional string fields; separate_secrets routes
that "" into secrets_config, which is a truthy dict; deep_merge writes it over
the stored value; save_raw_file_content persists it.

The blank does not even need the round-trip. merge_with_defaults injects the
schema's api_key default ("") into every save, so a client that never sends
the field at all still erases it. test_secret_count_message_counts_top_level_keys
was counting exactly that injected blank as a saved secret field -- the visible
edge of the bug, pinned as expected behaviour.

remove_empty_secrets() already existed for this, with seven unit tests and a
docstring describing this precise scenario ("clients will send those empty
strings back ... so that existing stored secrets are not overwritten with
blanks"). It was never wired into a call site. This wires it into both save
paths that merge into the secrets file.

A blank now means "unchanged" rather than "delete", which is the same contract
the helper's tests already describe. The cost is that a secret can no longer be
cleared by emptying the field; clearing needs its own affordance, since a
control that erases credentials as a side effect of ordinary edits is not one.

Verified by reverting the guard: the new round-trip test then fails with the
stored key read back as ''. 262 web tests pass with it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01STMbQE4YctTacQXfbYqKuW
2026-08-20 05:53:51 -04:00
4 changed files with 50 additions and 152 deletions
+2 -46
View File
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ import time
import logging
import threading
from typing import Dict, Optional, Any, Callable
from dataclasses import dataclass, field, fields
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
try:
import psutil
@@ -102,50 +102,6 @@ class PluginResourceMonitor:
"psutil not available - resource monitoring will be limited to execution time only"
)
def _metrics_from_cache(self, plugin_id: str, cached: Any) -> "ResourceMetrics":
"""Build metrics from a cached record, ignoring anything unrecognised.
ResourceMetrics(**cached) raises TypeError on a single unexpected key,
and that exception escapes into plugin_manager, which reports it as
"plugin <id> operation failed". Every plugin fails, and the plugin
system never finishes initialising.
Seen on a live rig: every plugin failing with
ResourceMetrics.__init__() got an unexpected keyword argument
'consecutive_failures'
which is a plugin_health field, not a metrics one. How a health-shaped
record came to sit under a plugin_metrics key on that machine is not
established -- a restored backup that mixed two machines' caches is the
likeliest explanation -- but the loader should not be brittle enough for
it to matter. plugin_health already repairs its records field by field
rather than trusting whatever is on disk; this does the same.
Unknown keys are dropped and named once, so a genuine schema change is
visible in the log instead of silently discarded.
"""
if not isinstance(cached, dict):
self.logger.warning(
"Ignoring cached metrics for %s: expected a mapping, got %s",
plugin_id, type(cached).__name__)
return ResourceMetrics()
known = {f.name for f in fields(ResourceMetrics)}
unknown = sorted(set(cached) - known)
if unknown:
self.logger.warning(
"Dropping unrecognised field(s) from cached metrics for %s: %s",
plugin_id, ", ".join(unknown))
usable = {k: v for k, v in cached.items() if k in known}
try:
return ResourceMetrics(**usable)
except (TypeError, ValueError) as e:
self.logger.warning(
"Cached metrics for %s unusable (%s); starting fresh",
plugin_id, e)
return ResourceMetrics()
def _get_metrics_key(self, plugin_id: str) -> str:
"""Get cache key for plugin metrics."""
return f"plugin_metrics:{plugin_id}"
@@ -170,7 +126,7 @@ class PluginResourceMonitor:
cache_key, max_age=None, memory_ttl=0 if force_reload else None
)
if cached:
metrics = self._metrics_from_cache(plugin_id, cached)
metrics = ResourceMetrics(**cached)
else:
metrics = ResourceMetrics()
self._metrics[plugin_id] = metrics
-100
View File
@@ -1,100 +0,0 @@
"""A malformed metrics cache entry must not take every plugin down with it.
`ResourceMetrics(**cached)` raises TypeError on a single unexpected key, and
that exception escapes into plugin_manager, which reports it per plugin as
"plugin <id> operation failed". Every plugin fails and the plugin system never
finishes initialising -- the health endpoint reports
`plugin_system: not_initialized` while the display itself keeps running.
Seen on a live rig, once per plugin, continuously:
ERROR - src.plugin_system.plugin_manager - plugin geochron operation failed:
ResourceMetrics.__init__() got an unexpected keyword argument
'consecutive_failures'
`consecutive_failures` belongs to plugin_health, not to metrics. How a
health-shaped record came to sit under a plugin_metrics key on that machine is
not established -- a restored backup that mixed two machines' caches is the
likeliest explanation, and the same rig had one restored onto it -- but a
loader that turns one bad cache entry into a total outage is the part worth
fixing. plugin_health already repairs its own records field by field rather
than trusting what is on disk.
"""
import logging
from dataclasses import fields
from unittest.mock import MagicMock
import pytest
from src.plugin_system.resource_monitor import PluginResourceMonitor, ResourceMetrics
class _Cache:
def __init__(self, payload=None):
self.payload = payload
def get(self, key, max_age=None, memory_ttl=None, **kwargs):
return self.payload
def set(self, key, data, ttl=None, **kwargs):
pass
def _monitor(payload):
m = PluginResourceMonitor(cache_manager=_Cache(payload))
m.logger = logging.getLogger("test")
return m
#: What the rig actually had under the metrics key.
HEALTH_SHAPED = {
"consecutive_failures": 0, "circuit_state": "closed",
"circuit_opened_time": None, "half_open_start_time": None,
"last_error": None, "last_failure_time": None,
"last_success_time": 1_700_000_000.0, "total_failures": 0,
"total_successes": 42,
}
def test_a_health_record_under_the_metrics_key_does_not_raise():
"""The exact failure: it must degrade, not take the plugin system down."""
monitor = _monitor(HEALTH_SHAPED)
metrics = monitor.get_metrics(" plugin-a".strip())
assert isinstance(metrics, ResourceMetrics)
def test_recognised_fields_in_a_mixed_record_are_kept():
"""Dropping the record wholesale would lose real history unnecessarily."""
mixed = dict(HEALTH_SHAPED, call_count=7, memory_mb=12.5)
metrics = _monitor(mixed).get_metrics("plugin-b")
assert metrics.call_count == 7
assert metrics.memory_mb == 12.5
def test_a_clean_record_still_loads_unchanged():
clean = {f.name: 3 for f in fields(ResourceMetrics)}
metrics = _monitor(clean).get_metrics("plugin-c")
for name in (f.name for f in fields(ResourceMetrics)):
assert getattr(metrics, name) == 3
def test_unknown_fields_are_named_in_the_log(caplog):
"""Silently discarding them would hide a real schema change."""
with caplog.at_level(logging.WARNING):
_monitor(HEALTH_SHAPED).get_metrics("plugin-d")
# getMessage(), not .message: the latter is only populated once a handler
# formats the record, so the obvious spelling silently never matches.
assert any("consecutive_failures" in r.getMessage() for r in caplog.records), \
caplog.text
@pytest.mark.parametrize("payload", ["a string", 42, ["a", "list"]])
def test_a_non_mapping_cache_entry_does_not_raise(payload):
metrics = _monitor(payload).get_metrics("plugin-e")
assert isinstance(metrics, ResourceMetrics)
def test_values_of_the_wrong_type_do_not_raise():
"""A dataclass will accept these, but a later float() on them would not."""
metrics = _monitor({"call_count": "not a number"}).get_metrics("plugin-f")
assert isinstance(metrics, ResourceMetrics)
@@ -194,15 +194,46 @@ class TestSavePluginConfig:
def test_secret_count_message_counts_top_level_keys(self, env):
# Pinned: the "(N secret field(s))" message counts TOP-LEVEL keys of
# the separated secrets dict. Here that is 2: the posted accounts
# array (all its item tokens count as ONE key) plus the schema's
# api_key default ("") that merge_with_defaults adds before
# separation.
# the separated secrets dict. Here that is 1: the posted accounts
# array, whose item tokens all count as ONE key.
#
# It was 2 before blank secrets were dropped, the second being the
# schema's api_key default (""), which merge_with_defaults adds to
# every save. Counting it was the visible edge of a real bug: that
# injected blank was merged over the stored api_key, so saving any
# unrelated field destroyed the credential. See
# test_an_unrelated_edit_does_not_erase_a_stored_secret.
resp = self._save(env, {
"accounts": [{"name": "a", "token": "t"}],
})
message = resp.get_json()["message"]
assert "(2 secret field(s) saved to config_secrets.json)" in message
assert "(1 secret field(s) saved to config_secrets.json)" in message
def test_an_unrelated_edit_does_not_erase_a_stored_secret(self, env):
"""Editing one field must not wipe the plugin's API key.
The config form renders secrets masked, so the browser posts them
back blank; merge_with_defaults injects a blank api_key even when
the client omits it entirely. Either way a "" reached the secrets
file and deep_merge wrote it over the stored credential.
"""
assert self._save(env, {"api_key": "REAL-KEY-0123456789",
"city": "Austin"}).status_code == 200
assert _on_disk(env.secrets_file)[PLUGIN_ID]["api_key"] == \
"REAL-KEY-0123456789"
# the user changes the city; the masked api_key rides along blank
assert self._save(env, {"api_key": "", "city": "Dallas"}).status_code == 200
assert _on_disk(env.secrets_file)[PLUGIN_ID]["api_key"] == \
"REAL-KEY-0123456789", "an unrelated edit destroyed the API key"
assert env.fresh_load()[PLUGIN_ID]["city"] == "Dallas"
def test_a_secret_can_still_be_changed(self, env):
"""Dropping blanks must not stop a real new value from being saved."""
self._save(env, {"api_key": "first-key"})
self._save(env, {"api_key": "second-key"})
assert _on_disk(env.secrets_file)[PLUGIN_ID]["api_key"] == "second-key"
def test_resave_replaces_stored_secrets_list_wholesale(self, env):
# Characterized: api_v3's deep_merge intentionally replaces lists,
+12 -1
View File
@@ -21,7 +21,8 @@ logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# Import new infrastructure
from src.web_interface.api_helpers import success_response, error_response, validate_request_json
from src.web_interface.errors import ErrorCode
from src.web_interface.secret_helpers import find_secret_fields, separate_secrets
from src.web_interface.secret_helpers import (find_secret_fields, remove_empty_secrets,
separate_secrets)
from src.web_interface.error_handler import describe_exception, redact_text
from src.plugin_system.operation_types import OperationType
from src.web_interface.validators import (
@@ -1216,6 +1217,11 @@ def save_main_config():
# Separate secrets from regular config (same logic as save_plugin_config)
regular_config, secrets_config = separate_secrets(plugin_config, secret_fields)
# The config form renders secrets masked, so every save posts
# them back blank. Without this the blank is merged over the
# stored value and the credential is destroyed by the act of
# changing an unrelated setting. A blank means "unchanged".
secrets_config = remove_empty_secrets(secrets_config)
# PRE-PROCESSING: Preserve 'enabled' state if not in regular_config
# This prevents overwriting the enabled state when saving config from a form that doesn't include the toggle
@@ -5599,6 +5605,11 @@ def save_plugin_config():
# Separate secrets from regular config (handles nested configs and
# array-item secrets — see src/web_interface/secret_helpers.py)
regular_config, secrets_config = separate_secrets(plugin_config, secret_fields)
# The config form renders secrets masked, so every save posts
# them back blank. Without this the blank is merged over the
# stored value and the credential is destroyed by the act of
# changing an unrelated setting. A blank means "unchanged".
secrets_config = remove_empty_secrets(secrets_config)
# Get current configs
current_config = api_v3.config_manager.load_config()