The phase table had B4 as "next" and B5 as "after B4" while both had shipped,
and described B6 as blocked on B4's gate — which is now merged and released. A
plan that misreports which phase it is in is worse than no plan: the next
person reads it and repeats finished work.
Corrected, and three things that were only ever decided in conversation are now
written down:
* **B6 is deliberately held.** 3.2.0 published 2026-08-03; 3.1.0 ran nine
months before it. B6's premise is that cores without the module are gone,
and there is no release-asset count or install telemetry to show that.
Running it now strands users on their current plugin versions. The gate
that makes it safe is already built and tested — it is the calendar that is
missing, and no amount of further code changes that.
* **Stop adopting further shared modules** (data_sources, game_renderer,
base_odds_manager) until B6 closes. Each adoption adds a copy to keep in
step against a payoff contingent on B6.
* **A B5 retrospective**, because "the adoption went fine" is not what
happened: four of eight shipped with scroll mode broken on a 3.2.0 core.
The bundled fallback did not protect against it — the break was on the
modern path — which is an argument for the sunset, not against it. Records
the ledger too: net negative on disk until B6 runs.
Also replaces the "what's next" list, whose first five items were all done,
with what actually remains.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Udr6MfaFLUPhX5Fgo67Jf5
Found while sweeping devpi for issues. Nine of 27 installed plugins were
reported degraded in the web UI -- including baseball-scoreboard and
f1-scoreboard -- for using a documented core feature.
The core reads three tuning keys out of each plugin's own config block:
vegas_width_pct and vegas_overflow (vegas_mode/plugin_adapter.py) and
vegas_max_width_screens (base_plugin.py). No plugin declares them, and 37 of
the 42 published config schemas set "additionalProperties": false -- so schema
validation reported them as violations.
That is not just log noise. _validate_config_schema_soft sets `degraded` in
the health tracker, which the web UI surfaces, so a user who tuned a core
Vegas setting saw the plugin marked broken.
The keys are stripped before validation. Fixing it plugin-side would mean 42
schema edits and 42 version bumps -- 42 store updates for a contract the core
owns.
Listed explicitly rather than matched on a `vegas_` prefix: vegas_mode is the
opposite case, plugin-owned and declared in schemas, and a prefix rule would
silently stop validating it.
Verified on devpi: degraded went 9 of 27 -> 0 of 27, schema-mismatch warnings
9 -> 0, 22 plugins still load, no tracebacks. 800 core unit tests pass,
8 of them new -- including that a genuine violation is still reported, so the
check has not been turned into a no-op, and that the caller's live config dict
is never mutated.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Udr6MfaFLUPhX5Fgo67Jf5
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* feat(store): evaluate compatible_versions, not just the floor
Closes the gap CodeRabbit surfaced on #427. `compatible_versions` is the
canonical compatibility contract -- schema/manifest_schema.json marks it
required, all 42 published manifests carry it -- and it is the only field that
can express an *upper* bound. `ledmatrix_min_version` is a floor and cannot
say "not compatible with 4.x".
The gate read only the floor, so a plugin declaring ["2.0.0 - 2.9.9"] would be
installed on 3.2.0 regardless of having said it stops at 2.x.
check() now evaluates both and the more restrictive wins. The array is a set of
alternatives (satisfying any one entry suffices), supporting every form the
schema permits: >=, <=, >, <, ~, ^, a bare exact version, and an inclusive
"A - B" range, with prerelease/build suffixes tolerated.
Refusal still requires evidence. Anything unparseable, absent, or below
TRUSTWORTHY_FLOOR resolves to compatible.
That last point needed a new strict parser. parse_semver is deliberately
lenient -- it strips non-digits and yields (0, 0, 0) for a string with no
numbers at all. Harmless for a floor (0.0.0 never blocks) but wrong for a
range, where the same leniency turned an unreadable spec into a *refusal*: a
manifest whose only entry was garbage got compared against 0.0.0 and refused.
Range specs are now shape-checked first, so garbage reads as "no evidence".
parse_semver itself is unchanged, since the loader depends on its behaviour.
Verified: 815 core unit tests pass, 18 of them new. Swept the real registry --
all 42 published manifests, at cores 1.0.0 / 2.0.0 / 3.1.0 / 3.2.0 / 4.0.0 --
and nothing is refused at any of them. The gate stays inert for shipped
plugins, which is the property that makes it safe to land ahead of B5.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Udr6MfaFLUPhX5Fgo67Jf5
* feat(store): protect the one population the sunset would break
The B6 sunset deletes each plugin's guarded-import fallback, so a plugin that
floors at 3.2.0 must never reach a core that lacks the 3.2.0 modules. The gate
could not stop that for the population most at risk.
A device installed from the v3.1.0 release reports __version__ = "1.0.0". The
gate treated anything below TRUSTWORTHY_FLOOR as "unknown, do not block" --
correct while every manifest floors at 2.0.0, because blocking would have
emptied the plugin store for those users. But after the sunset it hands them a
3.2.0-floored plugin with no fallback, which fails to load with one log line.
Nothing else in the system protects them: they cannot be told apart from a
genuine 1.0.0 install.
On an untrustworthy core the gate now refuses a floor ABOVE 2.0.0 and still
allows anything at or below it. A floor above the ecosystem baseline says the
plugin needs modules that arrived after 2.0.0, and a core reporting below that
-- whether it is the v3.1.0 release or something genuinely ancient -- will not
have them. Refusing leaves the user on the version they already run instead of
one that cannot load.
Measured against all 42 published manifests:
today (every manifest floors at 2.0.0)
core 1.0.0 / 2.0.0 / 3.1.0 / 3.2.0 / unparseable -> 0 of 42 refused
after B6 (same manifests floored at 3.2.0)
core 1.0.0 -> 38 refused, core 3.1.0 -> 38 refused, core 3.2.0 -> 0
So nobody loses the store today, and the sunset cannot reach a core that
cannot run it.
Two older tests asserted the previous "allow everything" behaviour; they now
express the new rule with a 2.0.0 floor, which is what their no-lockout intent
was actually about.
The 38-of-42 in that measurement surfaced a separate B6 trap, recorded here
because it will bite whoever raises the floors: four plugins (flights,
leaderboard, music, stocks) declare the floor as a TOP-LEVEL
`min_ledmatrix_version`, a third spelling, which declared_min_version checks
before the versions[] array. For those, editing versions[0] is a silent no-op
and the floor stays at 2.0.0.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Udr6MfaFLUPhX5Fgo67Jf5
* fix(store): address review — malformed manifests, and suffixed versions
Both CodeRabbit findings on #433 verified against the code and fixed.
1. Malformed manifest sections raised instead of degrading. `requires` as a
list hit AttributeError ('list' object has no attribute 'get') and
`versions` as a mapping hit KeyError: 0. Both reproduced.
This got worse with the sunset rule in the previous commit: that branch
resolves the floor for *every* manifest on an untrustworthy core, where the
old code returned early. One hand-edited or third-party file with the wrong
shape would have taken down the whole install path rather than just itself.
Container types are now validated and an unrecognised shape reads as "no
declared floor".
2. Prerelease and build metadata leaked into the version numbers. The digit
scrape parsed "3.2.0+build42" as (3, 2, 42) and "3.2.0-rc1" as (3, 2, 1) --
a release candidate ranking above its own release. Both fed reject
decisions, and the consequence was demonstrable: a plugin pinned to exactly
"3.2.0" refused a core running 3.2.0+build42, which is that same version.
The suggested remedy -- use the strict token parser -- would not have
fixed it. _parse_strict validates the shape but delegates the numbers to
parse_semver, so it returned the same (3, 2, 42). The bug is in the scrape,
so suffixes are now dropped before it. Prereleases compare equal to their
release rather than below it; full prerelease ordering is more than any
caller needs and equal is far closer to right than what it did before.
parse_semver is shared with PluginLoader, so its suite was re-run: unchanged,
and it only ever gets more correct here.
Verified: 839 core unit tests pass, 21 of them new -- six malformed shapes,
five suffixed forms, and the two demonstrated regressions. The real-registry
sweep is unchanged at 0 of 42 refused across cores 1.0.0, 3.1.0, 3.2.0,
3.2.0+build42 and an unparseable string.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Udr6MfaFLUPhX5Fgo67Jf5
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-04 13:46:05 -04:00
4 changed files with 248 additions and 35 deletions
@@ -212,9 +212,9 @@ one of them is safe by construction and the other is not.
| **B1** | Promote the nine universal methods; convert `sports.py` → package | ✅ | Characterization suite green; no behavior change intended |
| **B2** | `CelebrationMixin` + rotation strategies as opt-in capabilities | ✅ | Non-adopters have zero new code in their MRO; strategies checked against verbatim plugin transcriptions |
| **B3** | Upstream the scroll **orchestration** layer as `src/common/sports_scroll.py`, reading `global_config['target_fps']` natively | ✅ | Content building stays per-sport |
| **B4** | Ship 3.2.0 *and* make version reporting trustworthy | ⏳ **next** | Tag, release, and `src.__version__` agree; compatibility gate merged |
| **B5** | Adoption — guarded core imports: three pilots, then the remaining six. **Bundled copies stay.** | after B4 | Per plugin: harness + goldens byte-identical, then a device soak |
| **B6** | Sunset — delete the bundled copies | **blocked** | B4's gate shipped *and* in users' hands (see below) |
| **B4** | Ship 3.2.0 *and* make version reporting trustworthy | ✅ | Released 2026-08-03; tag, release and `src.__version__` agree; compatibility gate merged (#428, #431, #433) |
| **B5** | Adoption — guarded core imports, all eight. **Bundled copies stay.** | ✅ | All eight adopted; harness byte-identical; see the B5 retrospective below — four shipped broken and were repaired in plugins #251 |
| **B6** | Sunset — delete the bundled copies | **blocked, deliberately** | 3.2.0 *in users' hands*. Released 2026-08-03; there is no adoption data yet. See "B6 — the decision as of 2026-08-05" |
### B4 — what "ship 3.2.0" actually requires
@@ -265,10 +265,13 @@ migrate there.)
### B5 — adoption is safe by construction
A plugin adopting core imports keeps its bundled copy and reaches it through the
guarded import (see the Upgradability table above). On a core that ships the
module the plugin uses core code; on one that doesn't it falls back and behaves
exactly as it does today. There is no version of this step that breaks a user,
which is why it does not wait for B6's gate.
guarded import (see the Upgradability table above). On a core that doesn't ship
the module the plugin falls back and behaves exactly as it does today. That
fallback compatibility is safe by construction. On a core that *does* ship the
module, correctness is not automatic — object-level and scroll-mode validation
(building both classes and comparing, per the retrospective below) is required
to prove full behavior. There is no version of this step that breaks a user *on
an old core*, which is why it does not wait for B6's gate.
The hockey scroll-display pilot is **already validated**: adopted against a core
carrying 3.2.0, `scroll_display.py` went from 691 to 289 lines and all 16 harness
@@ -321,35 +324,115 @@ gate rather than trusting the failure to be noticed.
The same suite should exercise the install/update gate, since it is the other
half of the guarantee.
### B6 — the decision as of 2026-08-05
**Do not run B6 yet. Do not abandon it either.** The blocker is no longer
technical; it is calendar time, and it is the one thing here that cannot be
worked around by writing more code.
**Why not yet.** 3.2.0 was published **2026-08-03**. Its predecessor 3.1.0 ran
for nine months. B6's entire safety argument is "cores without
`src.common.sports_scroll` are gone", and two days after release that is not
close to true. There are no release assets to count and no install telemetry, so
we cannot demonstrate otherwise — and that absence of evidence *is* the answer.
Executing B6 now would strand essentially the whole user base on their current
plugin versions.
**What is already done and waiting.** The hard part is built and tested. The
install gate refuses a plugin whose floor exceeds the core's version, and
refuses one whose floor is above 2.0.0 when the core reports an untrustworthy
version — so a v3.1.0-release user (who reports `1.0.0`) keeps a working plugin
instead of receiving one that cannot load. Every adopted plugin has a
`test_core_fallback.py` covering both paths.
**What would unblock it.** Evidence of 3.2.0 uptake — a few months of it being
the default download, or store-side install data if that is ever added. Revisit
then, not on a schedule.
**When it happens, remember:** four plugins declare their floor top-level, where
editing `versions[0]` is a silent no-op, and the floor has three live spellings
"""Stripping core keys must not turn the check into a no-op."""
self._validate_with(
manager,{"enabled":True,"typo_key":1},
valid=False,errors=["Field root: 'typo_key' was unexpected"])
manager._set_degraded_safe.assert_called()
reason=manager._set_degraded_safe.call_args[0][1]
assertreasonand"typo_key"inreason
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.