Review follow-up. The range check accepted 1, 3 and 4, so a change to 4 --
which hands most of the resident saving back -- passed a test whose whole
purpose is to notice that.
Pinned to the value the unit ships, in one named constant. Raising it is still
a legitimate response to a frame-time regression, but it should be a visible
edit here rather than silent drift, and the failure message says so.
Mutation-checked: changing the unit to 4 now fails.
(cherry picked from commit 73fff8d2d5)
Measured on a live rig 2.5 hours after start:
RSS 1030 MB
Private_Dirty 988 MB
anonymous mappings > 10 MB 23
largest 104, 79, 66, 63, 63 MB, on 64 MB-aligned addresses
threads 9
cores 3 -> glibc ceiling = 8 x 3 = 24 arenas
23 against a ceiling of 24, all 64 MB-aligned: these are glibc's per-thread
malloc arenas, not live objects. The data the process was actually holding
accounts for perhaps 15 MB -- the widest scroll strip observed was 35,746 x 64,
about 7 MB as RGB and the same again for its numpy mirror.
It is bloat rather than a leak: sampled four times over 135 seconds, RSS sat
between 990 and 1030 MB rather than climbing. glibc gives each allocating
thread its own arena, grows them to hold peak demand, and never gives them
back. A process that builds and drops large images across several threads is
exactly the shape that produces this.
The device had 59 MB free at the time, on 1845 MB total.
MALLOC_ARENA_MAX=2 trades a little allocator concurrency for that resident
memory. It is a tuning knob rather than a fix for a defect, so the rationale
and the measurements sit next to it in the unit file, and a test asserts they
stay there -- a bare environment variable invites removal by whoever meets it
next.
Two things this is NOT, both checked rather than assumed:
- Not an OOM problem today. A grep for "oom" in the service journal returned
24 matches, all of which were the radar logging zoom=9 and zoom=7. The kernel
OOM killer has not fired: dmesg has zero matches.
- Not currently capped by the unit's MemoryMax=85% either. That directive is in
this file but absent from the unit actually installed on the rig, which
reports MemoryMax=infinity, so nothing is enforcing a ceiling there.
The saving is unmeasured on hardware: applying it needs a service restart,
which blanks the panel, so that is the user's call rather than something to do
mid-audit. If p99 frame time regresses -- it sits at 18.4 ms against a 16.7 ms
budget for 60 FPS, so there is not much headroom -- raise the value rather than
remove it.
(cherry picked from commit 446207ffbc)
ChuckBuilds